Monday Madness — March 25, 2013

Tim and Scott are back for another action-packed episode of Monday Madness. Tune in to hear them discuss the Faithful Four and life after Lent Madness. Also, they settle the question of whether or not the SEC knows the outcomes ahead of time.

Don’t forget to watch every episode of Monday Madness, both series one and series two. And while you’re glued to your computer screen, watch today’s video from Maple Anglican.

This is here for sharing on Facebook and the like. Or maybe it’s a free gift from the SEC for those of you who can’t wait to watch the whole episode. Whatever.

Monday Madness

13 Comments to "Monday Madness — March 25, 2013"

  1. Ernie Richardson's Gravatar Ernie Richardson
    March 25, 2013 - 7:36 pm | Permalink

    can’t seem to find http://www.50days.org

    • Mary W's Gravatar Mary W
      March 25, 2013 - 8:03 pm | Permalink

      I got to the 50days site fine…

  2. Carolyn's Gravatar Carolyn
    March 25, 2013 - 8:08 pm | Permalink

    I got to a 50days site, but it was not what I was looking for. I Googled 2x to see if I put the wrong address in. Mary W. what did you see at the website?

  3. Aleathia (Dolores) Nicholson's Gravatar Aleathia (Dolores) Nicholson
    March 25, 2013 - 8:12 pm | Permalink

    I stil think you two are MAPLE ANGLICAN.

  4. March 25, 2013 - 8:36 pm | Permalink

    What is Spy Wednesday? Maybe I should check the latest Archbishops video before submitting that question to them…..

  5. March 26, 2013 - 2:50 am | Permalink

    Unfortunately, everyone already knows the outcome for this year’s Golden Halo. Heretofore Lent Madness has been fun and instructional; alas, this year’s lesson includes the fact that there are bullies in every school yard.

    • Sarah Lawton's Gravatar Sarah Lawton
      March 26, 2013 - 5:06 pm | Permalink

      Sister Mary Winifred, I confess I’m baffled by this comment. It seems a good bet, from the comments and the voting patterns throughout, that Luke will “win” it all. I do think the SEC might think about not including the really big saints, like the four evangelists, as they will win every time (see the often-cited phrase in the comment section that “we wouldn’t have such-and-such wonderful saint if not for Blessed Luke [or fill in the name of any other evangelist or early apostle]. That’s like sending the SF Giants to play in the Little League finals! …. But I digress …. This love for Luke seems very genuine. I don’t get it about the bullying. Who’s bullying? There have been a few mean comments directed at Frances (sadly); nothing about Luke though.

Comments are closed.